The Daily: The Republican Attempt to Impeach President Biden

My name is Dynastee Taylor and I'm the founder of Dynastee's United Youth

Association in Englewood, California. We provide free educational career and

mental health services to youth ages 5 to 18. We are providing students hope and

creating programs that supports their overall development. When I see thriving,

that is the joy that these students bring to my life.

US Bank supports finding the courage to thrive. To learn how US Bank can help you

go further, visit usbank.com from New York Times. I'm Michael Barrow. This is The Daily.

The Speaker of the House has ordered an impeachment inquiry into President Biden,

putting into motion the third formal attempt by Congress to remove a president

in the past four years. Today, I spoke with my colleague, Luke Broadwater, about the

unique realities behind this one. It's Friday, September 15th.

Luke, I want you to walk us through this news conference a few days ago in which

Speaker Kevin McCarthy explains this pretty momentous decision to open an

impeachment inquiry. Right. Well, the House had just come back from a long August

recess and was about to gavel in to start its September session. And Kevin McCarthy

calls a snap news conference outside of the Speaker's office, what we call the

small rotunda at the Capitol. And he walks out. Welcome back, everyone. He sets

somewhat of a somber tone. You know, the months that we were gone in the weeks, House

Republicans have uncovered serious and credible allegations into President Biden's

conduct. And he begins to lay out why he believes there needs to be an impeachment

inquiry into President Biden. Now, here's what we know so far. Through our investigations,

we have found that President Biden did lie to the American people about his own

knowledge of his family's foreign business dealings. The first thing he says is

that President Biden lied about his son, Hunter Biden's business dealings. There

is evidence that President Biden made at least one very prominent false statement

and that other times he oversimplified or maybe made misstatements when

describing the business interactions. I witnesses have testified that the president

joined on multiple phone calls and had multiple interactions. But then he makes a

series of allegations about conduct that Hunter Biden engaged in and attempts to

link it to President Biden. And he does it in a way that is not really backed up to

date by any hard or concrete evidence. And that really is the link that has been

missing so far for the House Republicans, who through their various committees for

months now have, of course, been investigating President Biden and his

family. I'll give you one real quick example. Dinners resulted in cars and

millions of dollars into his sons and his son's business partners. In McCarthy's

speech, he suggests that Biden is responsible for getting his son millions

of dollars and fancy cars and things like that. And you know, Hunter Biden did

get expensive gifts and millions of dollars from overseas business interests.

What McCarthy is alleging and what Republicans have yet to prove is that

it was Joe Biden's intervention that caused those things to happen. All they

have uncovered so far is that on occasion, Joe Biden exchanged niceties with

business associates of his son, things like chatting about the weather or a

handshake. They have not produced any concrete evidence that he was directly

involved in any of these business activities himself. But that's the type

of thing the Republicans are digging into to try to prove.

That's why today I am directing our House Committee to open a formal

impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

He makes clear that he believes these are allegations that they are not proven,

that there is no immediate pending impeachment, but that he believes an

impeachment investigation is necessary to get to the bottom of them.

We are committed to getting the answers for the American public. Nothing more,

nothing less. We will go wherever the evidence takes us.

Thank you very much.

So in summary, McCarthy is laying out actual evidence of misstatements that

President Biden has made while president, perhaps knowingly, perhaps

unknowingly about his son, Hunter's business dealings.

And McCarthy is pairing that with allegations for which there's not

really much evidence that Biden was directly involved in those deals back

when he was vice president or afterward.

So at the heart of this is essentially the claim that before Biden was

president, he acted in a corrupt manner.

That's exactly right. Most of the allegations stem from a period of time

when Joe Biden was vice president, although they are now alleging also

that once he becomes president, his administration is engaged in sort

of turning a blind eye to these allegations and not investigating

fully the case against Hunter Biden.

Basically that there's a kind of cover up.

Yes, they do allege a cover up without a ton of evidence, but they allege a cover up.

So just to be clear, no new bombshell evidence implicating

President Biden has just been revealed.

No single smoking gun that explains McCarthy's decision.

I mean, everything he has laid out here that we're talking about is familiar.

And yet it never before merited an impeachment inquiry.

That's right. And in fact, the vast majority of the Republican case

against Biden has existed for years.

I mean, Senate Republicans did a lengthy report in 2020 that has the majority

of these allegations in it.

Now, they have added some new facts and some new evidence in the past year,

but it's not something that fundamentally changes the nature of the case.

So if there's not superdaming new evidence, Luke, help us understand the timing of this.

We have known, of course, that Republicans have wanted to impeach President Biden

pretty much since the moment he took office.

But why write now?

Why this week?

Sure. No, you're exactly right.

From day one of Biden's presidency, some members of Congress

have started introducing articles of impeachment against him.

They've wanted to impeach him over the situation at the border.

They've wanted to impeach him over the Fennel crisis.

They've wanted to impeach him over the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

So there are a number of reasons why they have gone after Biden from the start.

And so for most of that time, Kevin McCarthy has tried to hold off

the right wing of his party.

He says there should be no impeachment for political reasons.

He said Republicans should be above that.

They should follow a process where evidence is gathered.

He's also repeatedly maintained that no impeachment inquiry

should be opened without a vote of the full House.

That it should have the support of the majority of the body

before any impeachment inquiry is ever undertaken.

But there's a couple of things you need to understand.

One, Kevin McCarthy is clinging to the speakership by the thinnest of margins.

Remember, he only became speaker after making a ton of concessions to the hard right.

And one of those concessions was agreeing that any one member

at any time, if they were dissatisfied with Kevin McCarthy,

could call a vote to remove him.

Right. And on top of that, remember when we were barreling toward default

on our debt and in order to avoid that, McCarthy cut a spending deal with the White House.

Yes, I do.

Well, the hard right remains really mad at him for that.

And we are entering a period now where McCarthy has to make good on that deal

and fund the government by the deadline on September 30th.

And the hard right is saying, no way, we're not voting for those bills.

And they're telling McCarthy the only way he gets their votes

and avoids the government shutdown is to make some concessions.

And one of those concessions is impeaching President Biden.

So these hard right House Republicans are explicitly saying to the speaker

over whom they have a tremendous amount of leverage, given their slim majority.

We are angry about the spending deal you struck with Joe Biden.

We don't like it.

But you should know that if you want us to support that kind of a budget,

you need to go after Joe Biden with something like impeachment.

Yes, that's exactly right.

Some of them have made that very explicit and said an impeachment inquiry

into Joe Biden was necessary for their vote to keep the government open.

And so those are the real dynamics at play

and the great pressures on Kevin McCarthy.

But I think the thing that really tips it over the edge

is the actions of Congressman Matt Gates of Florida.

Matt Gates lets it be known that as soon as the House is back in session,

he plans to give a blistering floor speech against Kevin McCarthy,

in which he is going to demand that Kevin McCarthy come into compliance

with the far right or face removal from the speakership.

And it's clear that one of the demands Gates is planning to make

is that McCarthy get a lot tougher on President Biden and his son, Hunter.

And the clear implication here is that McCarthy better get going with impeachment

or he's going to face some real consequences.

So there is now a very direct, imminent and specific public threat

from Matt Gates against McCarthy's future as speaker,

unless he immediately complies with this request to open an impeachment inquiry.

That's correct.

And so Kevin McCarthy is faced with this choice.

Either he can keep with a position he's held for a long time

that an impeachment inquiry should only be opened with a full vote of the House.

At present, he lacks the votes to do that, I'll note.

Or he can change his position, give in to Matt Gates's demand

and unilaterally order the impeachment inquiry

and looking at the best way he can try to stay speaker and cling to his speakership.

He makes what I think a lot of Republicans believe

was the only choice he could make politically,

and that is to go ahead, change his position, reverse his previous statements

and order an impeachment inquiry to in some ways keep his job.

Right. And we know exactly what happens next.

McCarthy comes out, delivers this speech,

announcing that he's going to open this impeachment inquiry,

does exactly what he knows Congressman Gates wants him to do.

Yes. So McCarthy gets ahead of Gates.

He positions himself as the aggressive actor against President Biden,

which is always a good position to be in if you want to appeal to the far right

of the Republican Party.

But Matt Gates doesn't back down.

I rise today to serve notice.

Mr. Speaker, you are out of compliance with the agreement

that allowed you to assume this role.

He gives the floor speech anyway.

The path forward for the House of Representatives

is to either bring you into immediate total compliance

or remove you pursuant to a motion to vacate the chair.

And he proceeds to lay out all the ways

Kevin McCarthy is failing at Speaker.

But here we are eight months later,

and we haven't even sent the first subpoena to Hunter Biden.

That's how you know that the rushed and, you know,

somewhat rattled performance you just saw from the speaker isn't real.

At this point during.

So he makes clear he was not satisfied with McCarthy's speech.

I know that Washington isn't a town where people are known for keeping their word.

Well, Speaker McCarthy, I'm here to hold you to yours.

So this must have been pretty disappointing for McCarthy

because his call for the impeachment inquiry in Gates

gives this searing speech anyway.

Well, if you look at it from McCarthy's point of view,

he thinks he won the day.

If you look at all the headlines and the news coverage,

it's all about Kevin McCarthy getting tough with Biden,

him moving forward with this impeachment.

And that is for someone who has to govern the Republican Party in the House

and the far right, that's a good day for Kevin McCarthy when he looks tough on Biden.

And there is almost no headlines about Matt Gates calling for his removal,

which in an alternate scenario could have been the news of the day,

which would have been the far right pressures McCarthy calls for him to step down.

Right. And Luke suffices to say this is not the normal course.

By which an impeachment inquiry, this really grave historic decision is opened

as basically job security to save your job as House Speaker.

Well, it's not just about job security.

Remember, he's also doing this to try to avoid a government shutdown.

Kevin McCarthy is very interested in making sure it's seen that Republicans

can operate a functioning government and not plunge the country into chaos.

And so McCarthy may have won the day and he may have staved off

the hard right detractors for some time.

But now he's stuck with a unilateral impeachment inquiry,

which is something that he never wanted to do in the first place.

And now he has to live with that and all the complicated implications

that go along with it.

We'll be right back.

Hi, I'm Megan Lorrum, the director of photography at The New York Times.

A photograph can do a lot of different things.

It can connect us.

It can bring us to places we've never been before.

It can capture a story in a universal visual language.

But one thing that all these photographs have in common is that, you know,

they don't just come out of the ether.

We spend a lot of time anticipating news stories,

working with the best photographers across the globe.

These are photographers who have spent years mastering their technical craft,

developing their skills as visual chroniclers of our world, you know,

getting certified as a scuba diver and learning how to shoot underwater

to document climate change or tremendous cardiovascular training

in order to ski on the slopes next to Olympic athletes.

This is an effort that takes tons of time and consideration and resources.

All of this is possible only because of New York Times subscribers.

If you're not a subscriber yet, you can become one at nytimes.com slash subscribe.

So look, what will the opening of this impeachment inquiry

that Speaker McCarthy is now stuck with do and mean exactly?

People like Matt Gaetz have wanted this, but precisely why do they want it?

What powers in their minds does it give House Republicans looking into Biden

that they didn't already have?

Well, functionally, it doesn't actually change all that much.

You already have three congressional committees investigating

President Biden's administration and President Biden's family.

They already have subpoena power.

But Congress derives its authority from the fact that it's part of the legislative process.

And so a traditional congressional investigation really only is valid

in the eyes of the courts and the eyes of the law if they're actually engaged

in some attempt at legislating, rewriting a law, changing a statute,

introducing new legislation. Right.

But if a committee or committees embark on an impeachment inquiry,

they no longer have to come up with legislative reasons for what they're doing.

They don't have to try to pretend they're really rewriting the ethics code, right?

They can simply say, we're demanding these documents

because we are investigating whether or not the president committed

high crimes or misdemeanors. Got it.

And so it gives them, they believe a better argument in court

should some of their actions get challenged by the Biden administration.

Got it. Because up until now, they have, if we're being honest,

needed to manufacture a legislative reason to look into Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.

Perhaps they would argue we want to strengthen influence peddling laws.

So that's why we're looking into Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.

But in reality, that's not quite what they were doing.

And now that they have an impeachment inquiry, they don't need such an excuse

and they will have greater legal footing for a really aggressive investigation into both.

That's correct. Got it.

And I'm curious, were these committees running into any legal limitation

in their existing investigations of Hunter and Joe Biden?

Or was this just House Republicans anticipating that they might run into these problems?

Yeah, it's very much the latter.

Republicans have not faced a ton of fight from the Biden White House

or from banks as they've been trying to get these records.

James Comer, who's the chairman of the Oversight Committee, said in the past six months,

every single subpoena he has sent out has been complied with 100 percent.

So it's not because they've been encountering resistance to date.

It's that they believe they will encounter resistance and want to have their strongest argument

for demanding the records that they are about to demand.

So from what you're saying, opening an impeachment inquiry doesn't fundamentally change

these investigations.

It gives Republicans more legal confidence in the investigations.

But of course, impeachment has another very clear advantage for House Republicans,

which is political.

Oh, absolutely.

It serves a number of purposes for Kevin McCarthy.

One, it helps him politically on the Hill.

It helps stave off those hard right Republicans who have been calling for his head.

Two, it helps settle a political score.

There are a lot of Republicans on the Hill who still are bitter about the impeachments of Donald

Trump, particularly the first impeachment, which they argue had thin evidence.

That was the impeachment, of course, where Donald Trump was on a phone call with the leader of Ukraine.

And the allegation was that he was shaking him down to try to dig up dirt on Joe Biden

and withholding aid because of it.

Right. And we should say, dig up dirt not just on Joe Biden, but on Joe Biden's son Hunter

and many of the things that Republicans are now trying to look into.

Yes. Time is a flat circle.

It is all coming back around again.

But they're still bitter over that.

And they've been looking to exact revenge on Joe Biden and the Democrats because of the impeachments

of Donald Trump.

Three, Kevin McCarthy believes it's effective politically because Donald Trump is facing

four criminal indictments, 91 felony counts on a range of very serious allegations against

his conduct while he was president and even before he was president.

And they're hoping that an impeachment inquiry will muddy the waters in the minds of voters

and create the impression that, well, I don't know who's more corrupt

between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

And so it's hard for me to say as a voter.

And then the fourth thing, and I think this is what they're holding out hope for,

is that as they dig deeper into Joe Biden, as they dig deeper into Hunter Biden,

as they turn over more and more stones, that eventually they may in fact find

that smoking gun, which to date they have not.

Right.

And so they're holding out that if they just keep digging,

eventually they might get that really damning piece of evidence.

Well, to that point, let's talk about where this all now leads or doesn't lead this impeachment

inquiry, given the nature of an impeachment inquiry and the realities of this very narrow

House Republican majority.

Well, functionally, for the Hill, an impeachment inquiry can become an all-encompassing exercise.

It can suck all the air out of the room of anything else this Congress might want to do.

And it will become the focus of a lot of media attention and a lot of the work

that lawmakers are doing.

So it will have an intense effect on the operations of the Hill

as long as the impeachment inquiry lasts.

Politically, though, there are quite a few Republicans

who are dreading bringing this to a vote.

Yeah. And I mean, just as evidence of that, Kevin McCarthy does not have the votes right

now even among Republicans to even open an impeachment inquiry if he put this to a floor

vote there. And quite a few Republicans on the Hill who say we haven't seen any hard evidence.

Everything we've seen is innuendo and circumstantial evidence.

And we're not willing to impeach without something concrete.

And so in order to try to convince his full membership to go along with this,

he's got to produce better and stronger evidence against the president.

Right now, they have 14 Republicans who represent districts that were won by President Biden

and forcing those Republicans to vote to impeach the president who won their districts

and is popular with their voters.

In some people's view, that's a recipe for losing the House.

That's a recipe for a very unpopular vote for these Republicans.

And in fact, I was talking to Democrats on the Hill just yesterday who believe that this

impeachment inquiry will help them with moderate voters. They think that if moderate voters

look at the House and they see Republicans clamoring for both a shutdown and a political

impeachment of the president, that that only benefits them in 2024.

So bottom line, what you're saying is actually getting to a point where House Republicans

would vote to impeach President Biden is pretty unpopular among Republicans,

particularly the moderate ones, trying to hold onto their seats.

And they think might actually benefit Democrats.

So it doesn't seem like there's a whole lot of enthusiasm for this being anything

other than a gesture to appease the Matt Gaetzes of the world.

Right. And so time will tell on that.

Is it just an investigation that spins its wheels forever

and never leads to an actual impeachment vote? It could be.

But there's also a belief on the Hill that launching an impeachment inquiry is a bit like

jumping out of a plane. Once you're in the air, you're going to hit the ground.

That at some point after you've investigated enough, you will have to call for the vote

and you'll have to force this tough vote on the Republicans in the House

to see up or down. Are they going to move to impeach President Biden?

Right. And in which case they may need to do something that they know inflicts

a lot of political damage on themselves.

Right. And a lot of Republicans will tell you when they look back at the first Trump impeachment,

they believe that they did well when the Democrats moved against Trump on the first

impeachment politically and they don't want to see the same thing happen to them in this House.

Well, to that point, Luke, I want to end by asking you to reflect on the reality that we

are now enduring our third impeachment process in just a few years. This one, weirdly enough,

harkening back to some of the same circumstances as the first impeachment of President Trump,

Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, Ukraine. And despite very real differences between these impeachments,

it does feel like we are living in a world where impeachment is now viewed much more than I think

we ever imagined it would be as an everyday tool of political life.

Yes, I think that's very much the case. It used to be that impeachment was reserved

only for the rarest of circumstances. And in this Congress, we've seen various Republicans have

introduced articles of impeachment against five different members of the Biden administration,

the Homeland Security Secretary, the Attorney General, up and down the line.

And we've long ago, I think, left the idea that you had to prove a high crime to start an

impeachment inquiry. And we are now in the phase of the impeachment inquiry has enough political

benefits on its own, so might as well go ahead and do it.

Oh, Luke, thank you very much. Thank you.

On Thursday, federal prosecutors charged Hunter Biden with lying about his drug use when he purchased

a handgun in 2018 and for illegally possessing the weapon after a plea deal involving those charges

collapsed. The charges do not implicate President Biden, whose administration rolled out what the

Times described as a long planned strategy for defending itself against the House impeachment

inquiry. As part of that strategy, White House officials and their allies dismissed the allegations

against the president as baseless and debunked, attacked House Republicans for distorting the

evidence and pushed the news media to frame the entire conflict on the president's terms

as a naked act of political partisanship.

We'll be right back.

This podcast is supported by USA Facts. When debates heat up and opinions clash,

USA Facts steps in with the facts. They are a nonpartisan, not-for-profit civic initiative,

and their mission is simple. Present clear, straightforward data behind U.S. trends in

health care, the economy, crime, and more. This way, all Americans can engage in informed

discussions. Seek clarity and ground your debates in undeniable facts. Dive deep at USAFacts.org.

Here's what else you need to know today. On Thursday evening, with their latest contract set

to expire at midnight, members of the nation's largest union of auto workers are preparing to

begin a strike today against the three Detroit automakers, Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis.

The union said that the strike would likely begin with limited walkouts at specific auto plants

in an attempt to disrupt car makers' production, while still allowing most workers to keep

collecting a paycheck. Negotiations between the union and the car makers have made little progress.

The union has demanded 40% pay increases, arguing that the pay for the automakers' CEOs

has risen by the same amount over the past few years.

Today's episode was produced by Carlos Prieto, Rob Zipko, and Ricky Navecki. It was edited by

Paige Cowett, contains original music by Marion Lazano, Diane Wong, and Roine Misto,

and was engineered by Alyssa Moxley. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landfork of

Wonderly. That's it for the Daily. I'm Micah Babarro. See you tomorrow.

The show is supported by BetterHelp Online Therapy. The lights are out. It's quiet. It's time to sleep.

But your mind is going a mile a minute, stressing about everything in your life.

Sound familiar? Whenever they strike, racing thoughts distract you from what you need to focus on.

Therapy can give you a place to work through them, so they don't keep you up at night.

Get a break from your racing thoughts with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com

slash The Daily to get 10% off your first month.

Machine-generated transcript that may contain inaccuracies.