The Daily: Did Hollywood Writers Get Their Happy Ending?

This podcast is supported by 20th Century Studios, New Regency and Entertainment One

presenting The Creator from the visionary director of Rogue One.

Amidst a future war between humans and the forces of artificial intelligence,

a hardened ex-soldier is recruited to hunt down The Creator, the elusive architect of

advanced AI who has developed a mysterious weapon with the power to end the war and mankind itself.

Experience the movie event now playing only in theaters, rated PG-13.

From The New York Times, I'm Sabrina Tavernesey and this is The Daily.

After 148 days on strike, one of the longest in history,

writers for movies and televisions will return to work today with a deal in hand

that amounts to a major win for organized labor in Hollywood.

Today, my colleague John Koblin on why the studio is acquiesced

and what the deal means for the future of American entertainment.

It's Wednesday, September 27th.

So John, we're talking on Tuesday afternoon and by all accounts, the writers in the studios

have reached a deal on a contract after the writers striking for months and months.

And we wanted to come to you to talk about this and, you know, how this deal came about,

what's actually in it. But right off the bat, top line, highest level, what's your read on all of

this? Who's really the winner here? It looks like at this moment that the writers really

prevailed. You know, it's funny when the writers last went on strike, which was 15 years ago,

100 day strikes, so more than three months after that strike had ended, after they reached

that tentative agreement, the guild leader sent out an email that said something like, you know,

we didn't get everything we wanted. And, you know, we've sacrificed countless hours during

the struggle, but we did well. This time, when they announced the tentative agreement, which was

on Sunday night, I mean, it was like vibrating with excitement, that message makes me very excited,

because I think we might have actually saved the film and see the industry with this strike.

They came out and said, we say this with great pride that this deal is exceptional.

There has been so much at stake, and they would not settle for a subpar deal, because we're not

settling over here. So there is a perception within the writer's guilt that they got a big W,

like capital W, like capital V for victory. Capital V for victory for the writers.

And we've talked about this before, John, on the show, but just remind us what it was that

they had wanted. I mean, you know, this strike has been framed in pretty epic terms, right?

A showdown over what it really means to be a creative force in the era of the streaming revolution,

when the technology and the economics of the entire industry have been changing before our eyes.

But Nitty Gritty, what were the writers asking for?

Epic is one way to describe it. Another way they described it was, literally,

this is existential. This moment is existential. We are fighting for our survival. But by far,

the biggest issue was compensation. We talked about this last time, but let's go back 20,

30 years ago, back to the network TV days. If you created an ER, a big, big hit, hundreds of episodes,

even if it ends after, say, nine or 10 seasons, it's going to live forever. And the reason is,

it's going to go into syndication. It's going to go into cable. It's going to go into repeats,

essentially. And every time that would air on, say, a cable network like TBS,

if you were a writer of an episode, you got to check. So that's just money in the bank.

You bring that back. Kind of like a royalty. Kind of like a royalty, exactly. So now let's look at

the streaming era. If you create a hit show on Netflix, let's say Bridgerton, you get a nice

amount of money upfront after they greenlit the show. That's great. But then even if you have a

mega success like a Bridgerton, if you think about a place like Netflix, there's no syndication.

It just stays on Netflix. They're not licensing it to a cable network. So the money used to get

after a show is a huge hit, that doesn't really exist in the same way. So writers are essentially

asking for more money in several different places from the studios.

Okay. So more pay was really the number one issue. What else were they asking for?

They also wanted a little bit of transparency. Again, if we look back 20, 25 years ago,

we know how many people watched that episode of Friends or Seinfeld or ER. Nielsen used to tell

you how many millions of viewers are watching it. We do not have that same level of transparency

from an Amazon or Hulu or a Netflix. Though presumably they know it, given the fact that

it's clicks, right? For sure. They definitely know it. And they'll give us something these days

where here's our top 10 in the United States today. But the writers, they wanted to know that if it

shows a mega hit, we want to profit from that too. That's the way the old system used to work.

And the other interesting thing they were asking for was about AI.

And what exactly were they asking for when it comes to AI?

I mean, there were several different things, but let's focus on one, which is if I'm a studio

executive and I have a stack of Nora Ephron scripts, she wrote, you've got mail, for instance.

Famous writer.

Among many other great movies. But I take those scripts, I feed them into the AI robot,

and I say, give me a Nora Ephron style of a rom-com, of a romantic comedy.

That is the writer's worst nightmare because they don't want a robot to be the accredited

writer of a movie. So no good. No bueno.

I mean, I don't want a robot to be an accredited writer of my article. I mean,

this is like kind of scary, right? Robots should not be replacing writers.

That feels reasonable to me as well.

I feel tribal about this.

Okay. So that's the basic list of things the writers were asking for.

And now, Tuesday afternoon, we are about to live into the answer of what they got.

What do we know about what they did get?

So it's going to become more clear in the coming days.

But we know that they got a lot. We know they got much of what they asked for.

And, you know, we were talking about their statement vibrating with joy earlier.

Exactly, right?

The studio's only statement was the Writers Guild of America, the Writers Union,

and the Studio Alliance have reached a tentative agreement.

Period. Full stop. That's it. It was pretty muted.

So they gave up a lot more than they were anticipating five months ago.

And the union, they said they made meaningful gains

and protections for every writer in every sector of the union membership.

Translation, we got a lot of what we wanted.

Yes.

Okay. So the studios checked all the boxes that they put out there.

How do you explain such a victory for the writers?

Because, I mean, for months, it just didn't seem like the two sides were even talking.

Like the story was the picket line.

So what got everyone back to the negotiating table and ultimately to a deal?

So there were a few key moments. So after the writers go on strike, that's early May.

All of a sudden, the studios have two other contracts to deal with,

Hollywood directors and then the actors.

The studios are not worried about the directors or actors.

Why?

The writers have gone on strike many times over the decades.

They went on strike as we discussed 15 years ago.

Before that, they did it in 1988.

Directors and actors, they just have not gone on strike nearly as many times.

Last time the actors went on strike was over four decades ago.

Oh, wow. Okay. So just typically there's a big difference between these groups.

Completely.

So the studios negotiate with the directors, get a deal done really quickly.

The directors call the deal historic.

So one down, one to go.

And then sure enough, by mid July,

the actors do go on strike.

And it kind of stuns everybody, producers, agents, Hollywood observers.

But it also surprises the studio executives.

Okay. So the actors go on strike.

But what does that have to do with the writers?

So by the time the actors go on strike, the writers have been on strike for two and a half months.

It's mid July. It's getting hot outside.

It's hot in LA. It's hot in New York.

They've been walking these picket lines for two and a half months.

And the actors surprise strike because everybody was caught off guard.

They're suddenly wind at the backs of the writers.

They're not so lonely on those picket lines anymore.

It's this huge moment of solidarity.

The actors and writers, they hadn't been on strike at the same time.

Going back generations, it was since 1960.

So it had been years.

And that is what shut down Hollywood.

Because all of a sudden, cameras can't roll anymore.

You can't work without actors.

It got the attention of everybody.

Right. Now Hollywood is at a total standstill, right?

No one can work, including, by the way, John,

my own brother who works in the film industry.

He takes photographs on film sets.

Hasn't worked since the actors went on strike.

Really tough.

What do the studios do at that point?

So if you're the studio executives,

this is no longer one irritating union out there.

Everything is completely stopped.

So you have to deal with somebody.

And so the studios said, okay, you know what?

The writers, we haven't talked to them in months.

They've been out for a while.

We're going to turn to them first.

And what happens?

So effectively, very little happens.

There were negotiations, but it was just very on again,

off again throughout the month of August.

There was something about the month of August.

Everybody's on vacation.

Okay, of course there are a couple strikes happening.

Big deal.

Right.

The temperature changed the second we hit the second week of September.

All of a sudden, everybody's rubbing the sleep out of their eyes

from the summer.

And then they looked around and they said,

why isn't anybody working?

What's happening?

And also the studios just, frankly,

began to look at their balance sheets.

Warner Brothers Discovery, big entertainment company,

they had to go out and announce that our adjusted earnings,

because of the strikes, are going to take a hit of anywhere

between $300 and $500 million this year.

That's the studio behind Barbie.

Right.

Like the hit, huge performance.

And even with that performance,

Warner Brothers Discovery is starting to sweat this a little bit.

Wow. So I'd like, if this studio is struggling,

then every studio is struggling.

Precisely.

But it's not just the studios.

The writers, they've been at a work now for four, five months.

It's a long time not to get a paycheck.

And by time we're at September,

we noticed that some of the biggest name writers in Hollywood.

Kenya Barris, he created Black-ish on ABC.

Noah Hawley, he created the TV show Fargo for FX.

Ryan Murphy, he created American Horror Story.

They started getting kind of restless.

They were saying, what's going on?

Why aren't we even in a room?

We even talked to the studios in weeks by this point.

And they were trying to meet with guild leadership

just to ask, like, what's going on?

So they're saying, guys, it's been a while.

Hurry up.

What's happening?

Exactly.

And we're still reporting out what exactly happened there.

But here's what we do know.

The union and the studios then did agree to meet.

And that meeting happened last week.

And do we know anything about what those meetings were like?

Like any details from inside the room?

So here's what we do know.

Studio executives, top executives were suddenly sitting in the room.

Disney chief executive, Bob Iger.

Warner Brothers discovery chief executive, David Zasliff.

Netflix co-chief executive, Ted Sarandos.

And a huge executive at NBC Universal, Donna Langley.

They were sitting in the room that had not happened.

And what's the significance of that, John?

What did it mean that they were there?

It meant we mean business now.

Because it's like, whoa, if they're showing up,

they want to get this deal done.

It's close.

It's close.

And sure enough, within five days, over the weekend,

they reach a tentative agreement.

And how they did it's pretty simple.

They went down the writer's list of ass

and basically hit on all of them.

And most significantly, they open up their wallet.

And they open up their wallet in a way

that they weren't willing to do four or five months ago.

So basically, the studio's paid up.

Exactly.

So is the way to think about this, John,

that the writers kind of just waited the studios out?

Like that the studios couldn't deal with the math

of the strike any longer?

Turns out they also have finance departments

and accountants who were saying,

we got to get something on the table here.

Yeah.

I mean, the studios were hurting.

I mean, they need productions to be happening

because they need new shows.

They need new movies.

They need to put these things on their streaming services.

I mean, already we've seen significant fallout

from the strikes.

Perspective blockbuster movies that were scheduled

for this year have been moved to next year.

TV series that were scheduled for this year

have been moved to next year.

So they had to make this deal.

They did have to open up their wallet.

But just because they got this deal,

it does not mean that production

is going to start again immediately.

Remember, the studios still have

another contract to negotiate.

The actors are still on strike.

You had two walkouts

and you've got to solve one before you solve the other.

So post strike, the writers got a lot of what they asked for.

The reality is the cost won't just be born by the studios.

There might be a cost to the writers too.

We'll be right back.

Hey, it's Lauren Dragon from Wirecutter,

the product recommendation service

from the New York Times.

And I test headphones.

Sweat is actually conductive

because of the saline content in it.

So we basically make our own fake sweat

and spray it over and over on these headphones

to see what happens to them over time.

This is 85 dB of airplane noise.

We're going to put on some noise-canceling headphones

and see how well they actually block out the sound.

Put them on the ground and kick them over there.

Okay.

Go.

Are they broken?

No.

I have 3,136 entries in my database.

Kids, workout, running.

Does it have a connector that's lightning or USB-C?

What version of Bluetooth is it?

Does it have FDX HD?

We have ones that track your...

At Wirecutter, we do the work so you don't have to.

For independent product reviews and recommendations

for the real world,

come visit us at nytimes.com slash Wirecutter.

We even have one that's solar powered.

So, John, before the break, you said we're about to find out

how things are going to change under this new contract.

You know, what type of landscape that is going to set up.

And you said that it won't necessarily be without cost

to the writers.

At the highest level, how should we think about that change?

So, the writers made a lot of gains.

They're going to get paid a lot more.

But this also very likely is going to mean, on the other side,

next year, the year after that, and the year after that,

fewer TV shows.

So, tell me about that.

Why would necessarily that mean fewer shows?

So, let's use Netflix as an example.

Netflix's content budget last year was around $17 billion.

Oh, my God.

It's like a small country.

And this year, Netflix's budget is around $17 billion.

Next year, it'll be around $17 billion.

Do you see a trend?

I see a trend.

That's well been.

And if you're going to pay the writers more money,

and you're eventually going to pay the actors more money,

because they will get a deal at some point.

The strike is going to end.

Well, something's got to give.

Then you don't have as much money to invest in the same number

of TV shows or movies.

Okay, same pie, but if each show costs more to make,

you know, each slice, then there are going to be fewer slices

of the pie to go around.

Exactly.

Okay, so that's the downside for the writers.

Fewer shows to work on.

Do they understand that?

Like, is that something they've taken on board?

I don't quite know yet.

I haven't talked to them yet, but here is what we do know.

Going into this labor dispute, the writers were calling this

moment existential.

They said they were fighting for their own survival.

And with this new contract, screenwriting is still a profession.

The writers are still around.

They still exist.

But are they fully aware of what is a very likely outcome

that there are just going to be fewer shows?

I don't quite know yet.

So what does this new contract mean for me, for Jane Consumer?

Would you believe you may have to pay more money?

I know, it's shocking.

So basically, the economics of streaming, you know,

it's been difficult for most media companies over the last decade.

Peacock, Paramount Plus, Hulu, these are streaming services

that lose a lot of money and still do.

So those days where you were paying $7, $6 a month

and you're getting endless streaming content,

you pay a lot more than that now,

and you will likely pay more in the future.

So kind of like Uber, I had the app on my phone forever.

It was super cheap.

I used it all the time.

Suddenly kablam, it became really expensive.

I stopped using it.

Exactly.

And to make the balance sheets work,

you keep raising prices.

And now even more so in the wake of these strikes,

the studios are probably going to have to, at some point,

some point the next year, raise prices again.

So you're saying that the studios may just pass

the cost of this new contract onto us?

That's what some financial analysts are already saying.

And the other thing is the strikes have lasted for months.

So at least in the short and midterm, going into next year,

there are going to be fewer TV shows.

There are going to be fewer movies.

So you will find yourself on your couch at some point,

clicking on all these streaming services, saying to yourself,

where is something new to watch?

Like, I want, no, give me more choices.

I want more choices.

And you won't quite have that.

But John, what if I don't want quite so many choices?

I mean, maybe there's an element of silver lining in this.

I mean, there were so many shows, right?

Should there be that many shows?

Totally.

I mean, this is something if you put your serum in the arm

of creative executives, they will say fewer shows.

That is great because then we as creative executives

have time to focus on quality.

We have time to really get in there

and help writers with their script

and to help with the cuts of a show.

So yes, I think long term for consumer, it will be good

because no, we did not need 600 scripted shows

in the United States every single year.

I only watch a fraction of them.

It's hard to watch that much television,

even with all the time in the world.

Perhaps they can focus on the good ones.

That's right.

So John, it strikes me that this is a moment

where the streaming industry has just kind of lived through

its heady, young, maybe teenage days, right?

And now we are living into an era in which it has to grow up.

And in some ways we as consumers also have to grow up along with it,

which what I mean by that is we have to realize

that these shows do cost a lot of money to make

and that we're going to have to come to terms with the fact

that we're going to have fewer of them

and we're going to have to pay more money to get them.

Yeah, I guess maybe we're in sort of our adolescent moment

for these streaming services.

And as a result, it's a little tricky.

It's a little difficult.

It's a little tough and it's going to be tough for us

because the whole promise of streaming was

this was all going to be so much cheaper, right?

This is going to be so much cheaper than cable.

Let's cut the cord, subscribe to a few streaming services

and we're good to go.

But the prices have been creeping up

and there is talk in the entertainment industry now

of why don't we bundle a few of these streaming services together?

Max, meet Peacock, meet Paramount Plus.

So all of a sudden you're starting to recreate cable in some way.

So the cost in the end, it's probably going to approach

maybe even match at some point what we use to pay for cable.

So John, thinking about this moment we're in right now

with streaming and at the same time,

what's emerging from this new contract,

it's almost like we're going back in a way

to that old model of TV and film.

You know, the pre-streaming version

where big entertainment companies made fewer shows.

We paid more, but also the writers got paid more.

I mean, the studios would love to go back 20 years ago.

The writers would love to go back 20 years ago,

but that world is just gone now.

Streaming has changed everything.

This technological change has shifted everything.

But in the case of the writer,

you know, you're never going to make friends money again.

But if you do create a big hit on Netflix,

if you do create, say, a Bridgerton with this contract,

it does set you up a little bit better.

You're going to get more money than you did,

say, four or five years ago.

But what's kind of interesting on the other side of the strike,

the studios are over here, the writers are over there,

and they're both kind of just stumbling their way into the future,

trying to make this work.

Streaming has changed everything.

It's upended everything.

And both the studios and the writers

are just trying to figure out a way to make it to the other side.

When all of a sudden streaming is all that exists,

and cable television really doesn't exist,

or network TV doesn't really exist,

that they both still are around.

Writers are still writing,

and the studios are still making new TV shows, new movies.

So the contract, in a way,

is pushing our, you know,

adolescent, rambunctious streaming out of the house.

Streaming goes to college.

Music

John, thank you.

Thank you for having me.

Music

On Tuesday night,

the Writers Guild of America made the details

of its deal with the studios public for the first time.

It included major concessions on how the writers are paid,

including royalties for overseas viewing.

It also guaranteed that the studios

will not use artificial intelligence

to rewrite original material.

The union's 11,500 screenwriter members

are expected to approve the three-year deal

in a vote that begins on Monday.

Music

We'll be right back.

Music

They're not writers,

but they help you shape your financial story.

They're not a startup,

but their innovation labs create new tools

to help keep your information secure.

They're not architects,

but they help build stronger communities.

With global expertise

in over two centuries of experience,

Citi provides tools, insights,

and guidance to help businesses thrive.

They're not just any bank.

They are Citi.

Learn more at Citi.com slash We Are Citi.

Here's what else you should know today.

The legal troubles of former President Donald Trump

deepened on Tuesday,

when a New York judge ruled against him

in a civil case

filed by New York State Attorney General,

Leticia James.

James had accused Trump of fraud

for inflating the value of his assets

and seeks millions in damages.

But the surprising court decision

granted one of the biggest punishments

James sought,

the cancellation of business certificates

that allowed some of Mr. Trump's

New York properties to operate.

That could terminate Trump's control

over assets that include 40 Wall Street,

a family estate,

a golf club in Westchester County,

and Trump Tower.

The ruling will almost certainly

be appealed by Trump.

And the Federal Trade Commission

and 17 states sued Amazon,

setting up a long-awaited antitrust fight

that could alter the way Americans shop online.

In the 172-page suit,

the federal government accused the e-commerce giant

of protecting a monopoly over swaths of online retail

by squeezing merchants

and favoring its own services.

The suit alleges that the retailer's tactics

made it impossible for its rivals

to compete.

Finally, Ukraine acknowledged

that there might be some uncertainty

surrounding its claim

that Russia's Black Sea Fleet Commander

was killed in a strike on Crimea.

Kiev said that it was, quote,

clarifying whether Viktor Sokolov

had in fact been killed.

On Tuesday, Moscow released a video

purporting to show the admiral alive.

Today's episode was produced

by Shannon Lin, Summer Tamad,

Sydney Harper, and Rachelle Banja.

It was edited by MJ Davis Lin,

with help from Michael Barbaro,

contains original music

by Marianne Lozano and Will Reed,

and was engineered by Chris Wood.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg

and Ben Landsberg of Wonder League.

That's it for the Daily.

I'm Sabrina Taverni-Sie.

See you tomorrow.

As students head back to school this year,

extremists continue their politically-driven

attacks against public education,

while educators continue to help students

strengthen public schools.

Educators are addressing learning loss,

loneliness, and literacy challenges

through strategies that can be sustained and scaled.

Instead of banning books and censoring history,

educators are giving out books

and making schools places for kids to

learn by doing, focus on reading,

and access wraparound services.

It's all part of the Real Solutions

for Kids and Communities campaign.

Visit AFT.org slash Real Solutions.

Machine-generated transcript that may contain inaccuracies.